CFAES Give Today
News Releases Archive (Prior to 2011)

College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences


Treating Ash Trees Viable Option for Homeowners, Municipalities: Ohio State Experts

January 31, 2011

WOOSTER, Ohio -- Cutting down ash trees isn’t the only strategy for managing emerald ash borer (EAB) in residential and municipal landscapes, according to Ohio State University experts.

Entomologist Dan Herms and Ohio State University Extension educator Joe Boggs are among the 21 members of the Coalition for Urban Ash Tree Conservation -- a group of university researchers, municipal foresters, commercial arborists and public-works officials who recently signed a statement endorsing conservation of ash trees via insecticide treatments as an effective management option for EAB.

The statement can be accessed online at

“We want property owners and those individuals in charge of making decisions about ash trees in public areas to realize that cutting them down is not the only choice they have,” said Herms, who has appointments with both the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC) and OSU Extension.

“The decision to remove ash trees should be founded on sound science. Often, management decisions to remove healthy ash trees are justified based on the erroneous belief that this will slow the spread of EAB, which is not correct, or that insecticides are not effective. There are several cost-effective, environmentally sound insecticide treatments that can preserve ash trees through EAB outbreaks.”

The coalition does not advocate for all ash trees to be treated with pesticides. Rather, the group is calling for such treatment methods to be considered in association with tree inventories and targeted removal of unhealthy ash trees as part of an integrated management strategy to preserve the integrity and value of urban forests as much as possible.

Valued for their shade, ash trees represent anywhere from 10 percent to 40 percent of all trees in urban areas. They provide substantial environmental and economic benefits to individuals and communities, including increased property values, lower energy demands, storm water mitigation and storage of greenhouse gases.

An accidental import from Asia discovered in the United States in 2002, EAB has so far killed millions of ash trees in several U.S. states and Canadian provinces. The insect is predicted to cause an unprecedented $10-$20 billion in losses to urban forests over the next decade.

“We want to emphasize that currently approved treatment protocols for EAB have been rigorously developed, tested and refined by university scientists,” Herms pointed out. “In many cases, treating ash trees with these insecticides can be both environmentally and economically superior to tree removal when you factor in the ecological benefits of preserving the trees versus the cost of removal and replacement.”

Three systemic insecticides approved by the Environmental Protection Agency have been widely researched for control of EAB: dinotefuran for trunk, bark or soil application; emamectin benzoate for trunk injection; and imidacloprid for soil application or trunk injection.

Insecticide treatment is most appropriate, Herms said, after EAB has been detected within 15 miles, and is most effective when applied before trees are infested. However, insecticides can also help save ash trees with a low level of EAB infestation. Spring is the best time for treatment, but in some situations fall treatment can also be effective.

Details about EAB treatment protocols can be found at Additional information about EAB is available at

OARDC and OSU Extension are the research and outreach arms, respectively, of Ohio State’s College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences.


Mauricio Espinoza
Dan Herms